Write Insight Newsletter · · 7 min read

Why Early Career Researchers Can't Say No (And How To Fix It)

Saying yes is killing your research career...

Academic sitting in a whirlwind of paper.
It's easy to get lost in many requests as an early-career researcher (ECR).

One year into my assistant professor job, I was drowning. Twelve different projects, seven committees, four teaching assignments, and exactly zero time to write more meaningful publications. Why is it that smart early-career researchers consistently sabotage their own success by saying yes to everything? You know the pattern damn well. You accept every committee invitation, volunteer for every conference panel, agree to peer review papers in fields you barely know, and somehow find yourself teaching three different courses while trying to secure tenure. Meanwhile, your actual research — the work that will define your career — sits neglected on your desk, buried under a mountain of cool opportunities that seemed important at the time.

The result? You’re exhausted, your research progress has stalled, and you’re watching peers with fewer commitments publish breakthrough papers while you’re stuck answering emails about meetings you don’t remember agreeing to attend.

Today, I’m going to break down exactly why early-career researchers struggle to say no, and give you a framework to protect your research time without burning bridges.

Let’s get started.

Reason 1: You believe every opportunity is your last opportunity

Most early-career researchers operate from a scarcity mindset that makes every invitation feel like a career-defining moment. I got news, McFly. It’s not.

When Dr. Frankenstoner asks you to join the curriculum committee, your brain immediately jumps to: “What if this is my only chance to work with a respected faculty member? What if saying no means I’ll never get another opportunity? What if they think I’m not committed to the department?”

This fear-based thinking ignores a fundamental truth about academic careers: opportunities compound over time. The more established you become in your research, the more opportunities naturally flow your way. But when you’re overcommitted and your research suffers, you actually become less attractive for future opportunities. Your opportunity surface area shrinks.

Here’s what successful researchers get right at this stage: saying no to mediocre opportunities creates space for exceptional ones.

Reason 2: You confuse being busy with being productive

Academic culture glorifies the hustle (even more than solopreneurship does and at least those guys are getting paid), and early-career researchers often mistake a packed schedule for career progress. This is not a sandwich. You don’t need extra toppings for better taste.

You tell yourself that reviewing papers, attending conferences, and serving on committees is building your reputation and being a good academic citizen. And while these activities have value, they become career killers when they consume all the time and mental energy you need for research. And trust me, you need that time at the beginning.

Do this little mental exercise with me: Would you rather be known as the person who serves on every committee but publishes mediocre work, or the researcher who produces smashing solid studies but carefully selects their service commitments? The answer should be obvious (at least for me, it was), but the academic pressure to do it all makes this choice feel impossible.

The reality is that your research output will define your career trajectory far more than your service record ever will. Let this truth sink in the day you become a professor.

Reason 3: You lack a clear framework for evaluating opportunities

Without criteria for decision-making, every request feels equally important and urgent. You’ll get lost and buried under a mountain of work.

Most early-career researchers evaluate opportunities based on emotions rather than strategic thinking. Someone asks, you feel flattered or guilty or afraid, and you say yes before considering how the commitment aligns with your research goals.

This reactive approach to your career puts you at the mercy of other people’s priorities instead of your own. You end up building other people’s careers while neglecting your own research agenda. Take back control.

The solution: Install a three-filter system for every opportunity

Before saying yes to any request, run it through these three filters:

  • Filter 1: Does this directly advance my research agenda? If the opportunity doesn’t help you publish, secure funding, or develop critical research skills, it should be a hard no during your early career years. Your research is your primary job, and everything else is secondary.
  • Filter 2: Will this create meaningful connections with people who can impact my career? Some opportunities are worth considering even if they don’t directly advance your research, but only if they connect you with potential mentors, collaborators, or decision-makers in your field. Coffee with a graduate student about their unrelated project? Probably not worth your time. Co-organizing a workshop with senior researchers in your area? Potentially valuable. Do it.
  • Filter 3: Can I do this well without sacrificing research quality? Even if an opportunity passes the first two filters, you need to honestly assess whether you can deliver high-quality work without compromising your research. If you’re already stretched thin, adding more commitments will hurt everything you’re trying to accomplish.

How to say no without burning bridges

The key to saying no gracefully is to be honest, brief, and helpful when possible. It’s as simple as that.

Try this template if you’re feeling a bit uncomfortable at first: “Thank you for thinking of me for [opportunity]. I’m currently focused on [specific research project/goal] and need to decline so I can give it my full attention. I’d be happy to suggest [alternative person] who might be interested and would do excellent work.”

You accomplish three things with this approach: you show appreciation for being considered, provide a clear (research-focused) reason for declining, and offer to help in a different way. Most people will respect your focus on research, and many will appreciate the alternative suggestion. Well done, my friend.

Keep this mental note: every yes to something unimportant is a no to something that could transform your career. Make an active choice.

Your research deserves better than your leftover time and energy

The academic world will always have more opportunities than you can possibly accept, but you only have one research career. Don’t let the ever-growing Kraken of requests swallow you whole. Put yourself on the helm and steer ship, Captain Sparrow.

If you observe successful researchers like I do, you’ll see that those who build exceptional careers aren’t the ones who say yes to everything but they’re the ones who protect their research time fiercely and choose their additional commitments strategically. They understand that depth beats breadth, that focus beats hustle, and that sometimes the most important thing you can do for your career is absolutely nothing except research.

No better time than to start practicing this today. After you finish this email and before you say yes to your next request, ask yourself if it passes all three filters. I wish you the most success with this.

P.S.: Curious to explore how we can tackle your research struggles together? I've got three suggestions that could be a great fit: A seven-day email course that teaches you the basics of research methods. Or the recordings of our ​AI research tools webinar​ and ​PhD student fast track webinar​.

Custom GPT and Cheat Sheet

I wrote a Custom GPT that interviews you about an opportunity and will help you make a decision about whether or not you should accept the request.

Read next